{
  "annotation_id": "651be69f-0870-4904-b59b-4399dc5810a4",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:45.022000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:45.022000Z",
  "file_hash": "4a5ad6ac01aef85a86329927be8c5b33edb142ea1e12b2ba52a0b1d920a7befd",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The EPR paradox and the meaning of the Bell inequality are discussed. It is\nshown that considering the quantum objects as carrying with them \u0027\u0027instruction\nkits\u0027\u0027 telling them what to do when meeting a measurement apparatus any paradox\ndisappears. In this view the quantum state is characterized by the prescribed\nbehaviour rather than by the specific value a parameter assumes as a result of\nan interaction.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/9805074",
    "authors": [
      "A. Tartaglia"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1088/0143-0807/19/3/015",
    "journal_ref": "European Journal of Physics, 19,307, (1998)",
    "title": "Is the EPR paradox really a paradox?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9805074"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "04c72dd3-f9a3-4c1a-a2e4-695600672264",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}