dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaNuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach
| Authors | D. H. E. Gross |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | nucl-th/0503065 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0503065 |
Abstract
Nuclei are small and inhomogeneous. Multi-fragmented nuclei are even more inhomogeneous and the fragments even smaller. System studied in chemical thermodynamics (CTh) consist of several homogeneous macroscopic phases. Evidently, macroscopic statistics as in Chemistry cannot and should not be applied. Taking this serious, fascinating perspectives open for statistical nuclear fragmentation.
{
"annotation_id": "64164894-c5f9-41c5-8423-3797f769ee37",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:04.626000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:04.626000Z",
"file_hash": "da210802d315320df62f91043a2aff12097ba0bd7d6091211b9bdfbae08c8996",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "Nuclei are small and inhomogeneous. Multi-fragmented nuclei are even more\ninhomogeneous and the fragments even smaller. System studied in chemical\nthermodynamics (CTh) consist of several homogeneous macroscopic phases.\nEvidently, macroscopic statistics as in Chemistry cannot and should not be\napplied. Taking this serious, fascinating perspectives open for statistical\nnuclear fragmentation.",
"arxiv_id": "nucl-th/0503065",
"authors": [
"D. H. E. Gross"
],
"categories": [
"nucl-th"
],
"title": "Nuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0503065"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "d31970ab-5344-41aa-a983-474637fe826c",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}