dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaThe role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics
| Authors | Serge Galam, Frans Jacobs |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | physics/0703021 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0703021 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.physa.2007.03.034 |
Abstract
We study the effect of inflexible agents on two state opinion dynamics. The model operates via repeated local updates of random grouping of agents. While floater agents do eventually flip their opinion to follow the local majority, inflexible agents keep their opinion always unchanged. It is a quenched individual opinion. In the bare model (no inflexibles), a separator at 50% drives the dynamics towards either one of two pure attractors, each associated with a full polarization along one of the opinions. The initial majority wins. The existence of inflexibles for only one of the two opinions is found to shift the separator at a lower value than 50% in favor of that side. Moreover it creates an incompressible minority around the inflexibles, one of the pure attractors becoming a mixed phase attractor. In addition above a threshold of 17% inflexibles make their side sure of winning whatever the initial conditions are. The inflexible minority wins. An equal presence of inflexibles on both sides restores the balanced dynamics with again a separator at 50% and now two mixed phase attractors on each side. Nevertheless, beyond 25% the dynamics is reversed with a unique attractor at a fifty-fifty stable equilibrium. But a very small advantage in inflexibles results in a decisive lowering of the separator at the advantage of the corresponding opinion. A few percent advantage does guarantee to become majority with one single attractor. The model is solved exhaustedly for groups of size 3.
{
"annotation_id": "628329e7-1514-4400-abaa-34bf1c2172f7",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:17.760000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:17.760000Z",
"file_hash": "ecc5740ac90c365e6360eaec5bfc2eba3f67ea5181c2c3a3cd1b3c90392623fe",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "We study the effect of inflexible agents on two state opinion dynamics. The\nmodel operates via repeated local updates of random grouping of agents. While\nfloater agents do eventually flip their opinion to follow the local majority,\ninflexible agents keep their opinion always unchanged. It is a quenched\nindividual opinion. In the bare model (no inflexibles), a separator at 50%\ndrives the dynamics towards either one of two pure attractors, each associated\nwith a full polarization along one of the opinions. The initial majority wins.\nThe existence of inflexibles for only one of the two opinions is found to shift\nthe separator at a lower value than 50% in favor of that side. Moreover it\ncreates an incompressible minority around the inflexibles, one of the pure\nattractors becoming a mixed phase attractor. In addition above a threshold of\n17% inflexibles make their side sure of winning whatever the initial conditions\nare. The inflexible minority wins. An equal presence of inflexibles on both\nsides restores the balanced dynamics with again a separator at 50% and now two\nmixed phase attractors on each side. Nevertheless, beyond 25% the dynamics is\nreversed with a unique attractor at a fifty-fifty stable equilibrium. But a\nvery small advantage in inflexibles results in a decisive lowering of the\nseparator at the advantage of the corresponding opinion. A few percent\nadvantage does guarantee to become majority with one single attractor. The\nmodel is solved exhaustedly for groups of size 3.",
"arxiv_id": "physics/0703021",
"authors": [
"Serge Galam",
"Frans Jacobs"
],
"categories": [
"physics.soc-ph"
],
"doi": "10.1016/j.physa.2007.03.034",
"title": "The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0703021"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "c5b1b151-09ce-423a-b81b-0f0773cbf603",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}