{
  "annotation_id": "61e38a63-0ba4-445e-96b6-735cd4599e32",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:53.357000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:53.357000Z",
  "file_hash": "9ff2f693029007c65e5755508e791feebced98e9f6176d84c5e479e8c5e139b5",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Stephen Hawking\u0027s recent concession that black holes do not irretrievably\neradicate information after all has garnered much attention. It is refreshing\nto see the public focused, if just for a moment, on an important conundrum that\nhas fascinated theoretical physicists for three decades, and prompted much\nconceptual progress. The scientific issues, however, remain much less settled\nthan Dr. Hawking\u0027s celebrated wager on the question.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0408033",
    "authors": [
      "Paul Ginsparg"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.pop-ph",
      "gr-qc",
      "hep-th",
      "physics.hist-ph",
      "physics.soc-ph",
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "appeared as \"The Truth Is Still Out There\", New York Times Op-Ed,\n  3 Aug 2004, http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/03/opinion/03ginsparg.html",
    "title": "\"Information, please... ?\"",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0408033"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "7fcfcb3f-70e7-477e-a07f-791fe1365252",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}