{
  "annotation_id": "59a9dfa0-76ae-4b9b-bd6d-198326139b60",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:04.175000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:04.175000Z",
  "file_hash": "57c2f17d465a28d18c773e9d62bc369bef3b0d4f0000565df49903eeea4f10ef",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The cosmological concordance model is consistent with all available\nobservational data, including the apparent distance and redshift relationship\nfor distant supernovae, but it is curious how the Milne cosmological model is\nable to make predictions that are similar to this preferred General\nRelativistic model. Milne\u0027s cosmological model is based solely on Special\nRelativity and presumes a completely incompatible redshift mechanism; how then\ncan the predictions be even remotely close to observational data? The puzzle is\nusually resolved by subsuming the Milne Cosmological model into General\nRelativistic cosmology as the special case of an empty Universe. This\nexplanation may have to be reassessed with the finding that spacetime is\napproximately flat because of inflation, whereupon the projection of\ncosmological events onto the observer\u0027s Minkowski spacetime must always be\nkinematically consistent with Special Relativity, although the specific\ndynamics of the underlying General Relativistic model can give rise to virtual\nforces in order to maintain consistency between the observation and model\nframes.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0510170",
    "authors": [
      "Alasdair Macleod"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.gen-ph",
      "physics.hist-ph"
    ],
    "title": "An Interpretation of Milne Cosmology",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0510170"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "906ed0cc-54b8-4a33-91fe-2e2b9ac3d200",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}