dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaCr\'onica de un contraejemplo
| Authors | Daniel Duarte |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | 2601.06379vv1 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06379 |
| License | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ |
Abstract
In the 1960s, John Nash proposed a method to resolve singularities. Five decades of encouraging results could not prevent an unexpected ending: the method does not work in general. In this note (written in Spanish), we tell the story of the rise and fall of the Nash blowup.
{
"annotation_id": "584baf13-5c5b-4564-8c95-e18f25dc76ac",
"date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:07.569000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:07.569000Z",
"file_hash": "74ebdbada1579cfb333be6b38c14a4179caff38b39fa7dbdee76a78f4969767c",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "In the 1960s, John Nash proposed a method to resolve singularities. Five decades of encouraging results could not prevent an unexpected ending: the method does not work in general. In this note (written in Spanish), we tell the story of the rise and fall of the Nash blowup.",
"arxiv_id": "2601.06379",
"authors": [
"Daniel Duarte"
],
"categories": [
"math.HO",
"math.AG"
],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"title": "Cr\\\u0027onica de un contraejemplo",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06379",
"version": "v1"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "7c943f1e-cf22-46ec-a6b4-787f9127c162",
"id": "arXiv Dataset",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}