{
  "annotation_id": "54aac359-16dc-4e65-8356-99b9938d5204",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:48.276000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:48.276000Z",
  "file_hash": "aaf415db1adc2b80f811d8b76022862f62d94ead58793b5d4f23fdcda9a4ba40",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Two works related to the concept of probability in the framework of the\nmany-worlds interpretation are presented. The first deals with recent\ncontroversy in classical probability theory. Elga and D. Lewis argues that\nSleeping Beauty should have different credences for the result of a fair coin\ntoss in a particular situation. It is argued that when the coin is replaced by\na quantum coin, the credence is unambiguous and since one should not expect a\ndifference between classical and quantum coins, this provides a particular\nresolution of the controversy. Second work is an analysis of a recent criticism\nby Byrne and Hall of Everett-type approach presented by Chalmers. It is shown\nthat the criticism has no universal validity and that the Byrne and Hall\nrejection of any Everett-type interpretation of quantum mechanics is unfounded.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0111072",
    "authors": [
      "Lev Vaidman"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Probability and the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0111072"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "718aafd0-7e99-4020-90b9-ad7fe12221c0",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}