{
  "annotation_id": "5483644f-ad08-4d13-b586-97f8a65368e7",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:35.928000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:35.928000Z",
  "file_hash": "9c0a8acdc02cb5b13514d5e29f4c118bb54c57b33d04dc245b067c35faa63ebc",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "There are countless examples in the history of science that not only were the\nlaws of physics often incomplete and more limited in their domain of validity\nthan was realized, but at times they missed the mark completely. Despite this,\nour collective memory is often short on such matters, focusing on present\ntriumphs and quickly forgetting past failures. This makes us less tolerant to\nthat which challenges present orthodoxy. It may be of value to recall such past\ndeficiences as well as present shortcomings, particularly since science may\nalways be encumbered with such limitations. We can avoid serious pitfalls if we\nlet the past serve as a guide to the future. Subjects covered will include\nGodel\u0027s theorem, superconductivity, zero-point energy, the quantum and\nclassical Aharonov-Bohm and similar effects, theories of general relativity,\nMach\u0027s principle, black hole radiation, ball lightning, and the universe(s).",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0104001",
    "authors": [
      "Mario Rabinowitz"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.hist-ph",
      "physics.gen-ph"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "Infinite Energy 6:54-63,2001; J.New Energy 6:113-127,2001.IEEE\n  Power Engr. Review 13:4-8,1993.21st Cent.Sci.\u0026Tech.6:10-17,1993",
    "title": "Do the Laws of Nature and Physics Agree About What is Allowed and   Forbidden?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0104001"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "7806d76e-8a52-44e8-bff3-5d70ef36ba24",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}