{
  "annotation_id": "52762983-5a2c-4e83-8363-35203fba7488",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:02.805000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:02.805000Z",
  "file_hash": "6e65d1405369ba144ad2c6a0af3e69ecdca5c7b5c1b3bce709625b5aa0981764",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "It has been suggested that the ability of quantum mechanics to allow secure\ndistribution of secret key together with its inability to allow bit commitment\nor communicate superluminally might be sufficient to imply the rest of quantum\nmechanics. I argue using a toy theory as a counterexample that this is not the\ncase. I further discuss whether an additional axiom (key storage) brings back\nthe quantum nature of the theory.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0310067",
    "authors": [
      "John A. Smolin"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Can Quantum Cryptography Imply Quantum Mechanics?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0310067"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "25f10a0a-7b21-4caf-a073-7a0eaa7cd6d1",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}