dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaExact Keldysh theory of strong-field ionization: residue method vs saddle-point approximation
| Authors | Yulian V. Vanne, Alejandro Saenz |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | physics/0610032 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0610032 |
| DOI | 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.033403 |
Abstract
In recent articles [Mishima et al., Phys. Rev. A, 66, 033401(2002); Chao, Phys. Rev. A, 72, 053414 (2005)] it was proposed to use the residue theorem for the exact calculation of the transition amplitude describing strong-field ionization of atomic systems within Keldysh theory. This should avoid the necessity to apply the method of steepest descent (saddle-point approximation). Comparing the results of both approaches for atomic hydrogen a difference by a factor of 2 was found for the 1s, and an even more drastic deviation for the 2s state. Thus it was concluded that the use of the saddle-point approximation is problematic. In this work the deviations are explained and it is shown that the previous conclusion is based on an unjustified neglect of an important contribution occurring in the application of the residue theorem. Furthermore, the applicability of the method of steepest descent for the ionization of Rydberg states is discussed and an improvement of the standard result is suggested that successfully removes the otherwise drastic failure for large principal quantum numbers.
{
"annotation_id": "4c2792f9-ccb7-4d4f-b05f-5a6f7ece9841",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:14.916000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:14.916000Z",
"file_hash": "91a59b32e00fd13c32cafe2d75e90a25f6e107205c84f57857c190ea290d44df",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "In recent articles [Mishima et al., Phys. Rev. A, 66, 033401(2002); Chao,\nPhys. Rev. A, 72, 053414 (2005)] it was proposed to use the residue theorem for\nthe exact calculation of the transition amplitude describing strong-field\nionization of atomic systems within Keldysh theory. This should avoid the\nnecessity to apply the method of steepest descent (saddle-point approximation).\nComparing the results of both approaches for atomic hydrogen a difference by a\nfactor of 2 was found for the 1s, and an even more drastic deviation for the 2s\nstate. Thus it was concluded that the use of the saddle-point approximation is\nproblematic. In this work the deviations are explained and it is shown that the\nprevious conclusion is based on an unjustified neglect of an important\ncontribution occurring in the application of the residue theorem. Furthermore,\nthe applicability of the method of steepest descent for the ionization of\nRydberg states is discussed and an improvement of the standard result is\nsuggested that successfully removes the otherwise drastic failure for large\nprincipal quantum numbers.",
"arxiv_id": "physics/0610032",
"authors": [
"Yulian V. Vanne",
"Alejandro Saenz"
],
"categories": [
"physics.atom-ph",
"physics.comp-ph"
],
"doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.75.033403",
"title": "Exact Keldysh theory of strong-field ionization: residue method vs saddle-point approximation",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0610032"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "f244c1f2-ea36-4c20-a6b4-7e7619c1a394",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}