dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaReply to "Comment on 'Comparison of potential models with the pp-scattering data below 350 MeV.' "
| Authors | V. Stoks, J. J. de Swart |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | nucl-th/9312004 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9312004 |
Abstract
Replying to the above Comment by G.Q.Li and R.Machleidt, we point out that the supposed "flaws" in our Comparison of NN potential models with the pp- scattering data [ Phys.Rev.C47,761(1993) ] are in reality not flaws at all.
{
"annotation_id": "4b1129f5-70b5-426b-84c6-407ba5413100",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:11.476000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:11.476000Z",
"file_hash": "0f9b64df145b5938d3cf2b64be9327a3dce22e0a27b870c834f2a9905a7698f6",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "Replying to the above Comment by G.Q.Li and R.Machleidt, we point out that\nthe supposed \"flaws\" in our Comparison of NN potential models with the pp-\nscattering data [ Phys.Rev.C47,761(1993) ] are in reality not flaws at all.",
"arxiv_id": "nucl-th/9312004",
"authors": [
"V. Stoks",
"J. J. de Swart"
],
"categories": [
"nucl-th"
],
"title": "Reply to \"Comment on \u0027Comparison of potential models with the pp-scattering data below 350 MeV.\u0027 \"",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9312004"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "0bddcdad-8e4c-4f2b-bfe7-2ba0bfc6b8a4",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}