{
  "annotation_id": "47c1dd1e-163c-44c5-b402-bb5f05f07e55",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:18.437000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:18.437000Z",
  "file_hash": "9956cf4f51b3302c1013e2a0df7531b00d0471f9b8aebf8a6fb84c90783cd760",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "I discuss a hypothetical historical context in which a Bohm-like\ndeterministic interpretation of the Schrodinger equation could have been\nproposed before the Born probabilistic interpretation and argue that in such a\ncontext the Copenhagen (Bohr) interpretation would probably have never achieved\ngreat popularity among physicists.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0702069",
    "authors": [
      "H. Nikolic"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.soc-ph",
      "hep-th",
      "physics.hist-ph",
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1119/1.2805241",
    "journal_ref": "Am.J.Phys.76:143-146,2008",
    "title": "Would Bohr be born if Bohm were born before Born?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0702069"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "24a1fa65-09ae-468b-a8b1-e2ea2b584742",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}