{
  "annotation_id": "474c5ee6-3217-49ab-8b68-43cbabf54d75",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:13.624000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:13.624000Z",
  "file_hash": "ea2621bbca5548248e9455a8e8e6e934c67fb8c2d55ed93f6e17fb1050a943cf",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "A test of quantum mechanics proposed by K. Popper and dealing with\ntwo-particle entangled states emitted from a fixed source has been criticized\nby several authors. Some of them claim that the test becomes inconclusive once\nall the quantum aspects of the source are considered. Moreover, another\ncriticism states that the predictions attributed to quantum mechanics in\nPopper\u0027s analysis are untenable. We reconsider these criticisms and show that,\nto a large extend, the `falsifiability\u0027 potential of the test remains\nunaffected.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0501134",
    "authors": [
      "A. Bramon",
      "R. Escribano"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "in Fundamental Physics Meeting \"Alberto Galindo\", R. F.\n  Alvarez-Estrada, A. Dobado, L. A. Fernandez, M. A. Martin-Delgado, A. Munoz\n  Sudupe (Eds.). Aula Documental de Investigacion, Madrid, 2004, pp. 201-207",
    "title": "Popper\u0027s test of Quantum Mechanics",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0501134"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "af995e43-1a5f-42b4-bb89-67af2c21051b",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}