{
  "annotation_id": "46c90a97-1ab6-45aa-98cf-e914a0ee5821",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:53.497000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:53.497000Z",
  "file_hash": "4b1d2625a4935f5467a12fe68cda3c3a8f75995ae0ab0fbc110f37d759562131",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We have performed a comparison of laser (LsOPM) and lamp (LpOPM) pumped\ncesium vapor magnetometers. Although the LsOPM operated 50% above its\nshot-noise limit we found an intrinsic sensitivity of 15 fT/\\sqrt{Hz} and 25\nfT/\\sqrt{Hz} for the LsOPM and LpOPM respectively. Two modes of operation,\nviz.,the phase-stabilized and the self-oscillating mode were investigated and\nfound to yield a similar performance. We have compared the performance of the\nLsOPM and the LpOPM directly by simultaneous measurements of field fluctuations\nof a 2 microtesla magnetic field inside a multilayer magnetic shield and have\nused one of the magnetometers for an active field stabilization. In the\nstabilized mode we found a gradient instability of 25 fT within an integration\ntime of 100 s, which represents an upper limit of the long-term stability of\nthe magnetometers.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0412011",
    "authors": [
      "S. Groeger",
      "A. S. Pazgalev",
      "A. Weis"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.atom-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1007/s00340-005-1773-x",
    "title": "Comparison of discharge lamp and laser pumped cesium magnetometers",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0412011"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "8388dafd-9586-41eb-9116-e11e6858ee57",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}