{
  "annotation_id": "4659fc2c-5b9d-471f-84f5-f09cb1561d9a",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:14.814000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:14.814000Z",
  "file_hash": "a4e824cfec8f59099f2395d6f6960098f71397af5892ed560feffaf495e001e6",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The experimental detection of the sharp lines of the \\ee Puzzle is viewed as\na struggle against Doppler broadening. Gedanken experiments which are realistic\nin zeroth order of detail are analyzed to show that the ORANGE and EPOS/I\ngeometries select narrower slices of a Doppler broadened line than spherically\ninclusive (APEX and EPOS/II --like) apparati. Roughly speaking, the latter\nrequire event-by-event Doppler reconstruction simply to regain an even footing\nwith the former. This suggests that APEX\u0027 or EPOS/II\u0027s coincident pair\ndistributions must be statistically superior to those of EPOS/I or ORANGE in\norder to support a comparable inference about sharp structure. Under present\ncircumstances, independent alternative data is invaluable. Therefore, a\ncorroboration of Sakai\u0027s 330.1 keV ($\u003c$ 3 keV wide) electron line in few MeV\n$e^+$ or $e^-$ bombardments of U and Th targets could prove crucial.",
    "arxiv_id": "nucl-th/9601034",
    "authors": [
      "James J. Griffin"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "nucl-th"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "Acta Phys.Polon. B27 (1996) 2087-2098",
    "title": "The Doppler Paradigm and the APEX-EPOS-ORANGE Quandary",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9601034"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "710d2603-8e87-43a4-b3b6-ac56bebed958",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}