{
  "annotation_id": "404725fc-b31e-4943-8a31-68bc17c92fa5",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:56.277000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:56.277000Z",
  "file_hash": "bf8fa5736f9a34ed92cfec215f83c05b6f19f9e82b4cb5563548d2297b281e53",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "An analysis is made of Deutsch\u0027s recent claim to have derived the Born rule\nfrom decision-theoretic assumptions. It is argued that Deutsch\u0027s proof must be\nunderstood in the explicit context of the Everett interpretation, and that in\nthis context, it essentially succeeds. Some comments are made about the\ncriticism of Deutsch\u0027s proof by Barnum, Caves, Finkelstein, Fuchs, and Schack;\nit is argued that the flaw which they point out in the proof does not apply if\nthe Everett interpretation is assumed.\n  A longer version of this paper, entitled \"Quantum Probability and Decision\nTheory, Revisted\", is also available online.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0303050",
    "authors": [
      "David Wallace"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Everettian Rationality: defending Deutsch\u0027s approach to probability in   the Everett interpretation",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0303050"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "d6bd0846-9cae-4859-a55d-e19a27f6026d",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}