{
  "annotation_id": "3f868d49-97fb-471c-8224-28a16ab892e5",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:11.013000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:11.013000Z",
  "file_hash": "ae031bc8d65b3a0a39a41db109d29e3c3de1d59cf9cf415c8d3f827c2b93b380",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The EPR paradox is known as an interpretive problem, as well as a technical\ndiscovery in quantum mechanics. It defined the basic features of two-quantum\nentanglement, as needed to study the relationships between two non-commuting\nvariables. In contrast, four variables are observed in a typical Bell\nexperiment. This is no longer the same problem. The full complexity of this\nprocess can only be captured by the analysis of four-quantum entanglement.\nIndeed, a new paradox emerges in this context, with straightforward\nconsequences. Quantum mechanics cannot violate CHSH-type inequalities, in the\nsame sense in which local realism cannot do it. The solution is to assume that\nquantum correlations do not work at the level of full populations, when\nviolations occur, but only apply to incompatible slices of input beams.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0609050",
    "authors": [
      "Ghenadie N. Mardari"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.gen-ph"
    ],
    "license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
    "title": "Does quantum mechanics violate Bell\u0027s inequality?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0609050"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "0dd57bf4-6b52-459f-a35a-da29bfdabdfb",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}