{
  "annotation_id": "3f6ea858-1da9-42ad-8598-f55ac969e53a",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:30.844000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:30.844000Z",
  "file_hash": "712fd528f95593ecef256a97fc934d650ab61512fbfb9c9233b0333439337a0f",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We review the Consistent Amplitude approach to Quantum Theory and argue that\nquantum probabilities are explicitly Bayesian. In this approach amplitudes are\ntools for inference. They codify objective information about how complicated\nexperimental setups are put together from simpler ones. Thus, probabilities may\nbe partially subjective but the amplitudes are not.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0610076",
    "authors": [
      "Ariel Caticha"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1063/1.2713447",
    "title": "From Objective Amplitudes to Bayesian Probabilities",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610076"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "f3c2d942-1808-4101-acf3-cf191aa55785",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}