dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaOrthodoxy and Heterodoxy in the Research on the Foundations of Quantum Physics: E. P. Wigner's Case
| Authors | Olival Freire Jr |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | physics/0602028 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0602028 |
Abstract
Dealing with Eugene Wigner's ideas on the measurement procedure in quantum physics and unearthing the controversy that pitted him against supporters of the interpretation of complementarity, I will show how Wigner and his followers contributed to the defeat of a seemingly unshakeable consensus. In fact, although he intended to defend what seemed to him to be orthodoxy, he himself became a heterodox. I suggest that Wigner's conjectures on the role of consciousness in physical phenomena were not fruitful and were discarded, being today part of the history of physics rather than physics proper. However, his ideas and actions left an indelible mark on the physics of the second half of the 20th century. Namely, he formulated his ideas in opposition to the Copenhagen monocracy, which held a stronghold on the interpretation of quantum physics until the late 1960s; he stressed the unsolved status of the measurement problem; and he effectively defended his ideas and supported those who were willing to investigate the foundations of quantum physics. He thus contributed to the creation of a new field of physical research, that of the foundations of quantum physics, which attributed a higher scientific status to the old controversy on the interpretations and foundations of this theory. This new field has had to deal with important theoretical, experimental, and philosophical issues, and significant repercussions have arisen in the last decades.
{
"annotation_id": "3f2f9f1d-b926-4d6a-b55a-cab7045a257d",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:07.651000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:07.651000Z",
"file_hash": "29c097d07cca731dcfad3e5674f7195503eb838ec9695985aa2f6334f5c0c662",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "Dealing with Eugene Wigner\u0027s ideas on the measurement procedure in quantum\nphysics and unearthing the controversy that pitted him against supporters of\nthe interpretation of complementarity, I will show how Wigner and his followers\ncontributed to the defeat of a seemingly unshakeable consensus. In fact,\nalthough he intended to defend what seemed to him to be orthodoxy, he himself\nbecame a heterodox. I suggest that Wigner\u0027s conjectures on the role of\nconsciousness in physical phenomena were not fruitful and were discarded, being\ntoday part of the history of physics rather than physics proper. However, his\nideas and actions left an indelible mark on the physics of the second half of\nthe 20th century. Namely, he formulated his ideas in opposition to the\nCopenhagen monocracy, which held a stronghold on the interpretation of quantum\nphysics until the late 1960s; he stressed the unsolved status of the\nmeasurement problem; and he effectively defended his ideas and supported those\nwho were willing to investigate the foundations of quantum physics. He thus\ncontributed to the creation of a new field of physical research, that of the\nfoundations of quantum physics, which attributed a higher scientific status to\nthe old controversy on the interpretations and foundations of this theory. This\nnew field has had to deal with important theoretical, experimental, and\nphilosophical issues, and significant repercussions have arisen in the last\ndecades.",
"arxiv_id": "physics/0602028",
"authors": [
"Olival Freire Jr"
],
"categories": [
"physics.hist-ph"
],
"title": "Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy in the Research on the Foundations of Quantum Physics: E. P. Wigner\u0027s Case",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0602028"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "07b3d9f0-6a9c-477b-bf00-0728144d5777",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}