{
  "annotation_id": "3d8c7ae3-015f-4cf6-b1cf-30cfa56afa51",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:02.801000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:02.801000Z",
  "file_hash": "dcd0f8b774f8ff63d323153915acf9838472aad7ff01ed75824c88f4c18ba1a2",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We report that, for the generation of a secure cryptographic key from\ncorrelations established through a noisy quantum channel, the quantum and\nclassical advantage distillation procedures are not equivalent, when coherent\neavesdropping attacks are duly taken into account. The quantum procedure can\ntolerate markedly more noise in the channel than the classical procedure.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0310156",
    "authors": [
      "Dagomir Kaszlikowski",
      "Lim Jenn Yang",
      "L. C. Kwek",
      "Berthold-Georg Englert"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Quantum and classical advantage distillation are not equivalent",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0310156"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "8ae4ecda-197f-4946-ba11-bdf5c1235608",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}