{
  "annotation_id": "3d206499-d554-4c13-8228-306692c5f0c0",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:44.804000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:44.804000Z",
  "file_hash": "3a2e34abca20913144610b3f0c4d7ba0bee9212b3db8209228b7af8392b6b547",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "It is hypothesised, following Conrad et al. (1988)\n(http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/papers/urbino.html) that quantum physics\nis not the ultimate theory of nature, but merely a theoretical account of the\nphenomena manifested in nature under particular conditions. These phenomena\nparallel cognitive phenomena in biosystems in a number of ways and are assumed\nto arise from related mechanisms. Quantum and biological accounts are\ncomplementary in the sense of Bohr and quantum accounts may be incomplete. In\nparticular, following ideas of Stapp, \u0027the observer\u0027 is a system that, while\nlying outside the descriptive capacities of quantum mechanics, creates\nobservable phenomena such as wave function collapse through its probing\nactivities. Better understanding of such processes may pave the way to new\nscience.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0105027",
    "authors": [
      "Brian D. Josephson"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph",
      "physics.gen-ph"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "Biosystems 64 (1-3), pp. 43-45, Jan. 2002",
    "title": "\u0027Beyond quantum theory: a realist psycho-biological interpretation of   reality\u0027 revisited",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105027"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "de764eed-13a1-42c5-86c0-3692a9f59669",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}