dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaWhat's wrong with this rebuttal?
| Authors | A. F. Kracklauer |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0604124 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0604124 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10702-006-1016-3 |
| Journal | Found. Phys. Lett., 19 (6), 625-629 (2006) |
Abstract
A recent rebuttal to criticism of Bell's analysis is shown to be defective by fault of failure to consider all hypothetical conditions input into the derivation of Bell Inequalitites.
{
"annotation_id": "3c0ba253-fc1c-4544-a364-877b5f5f82b7",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:27.448000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:27.448000Z",
"file_hash": "74f0aed01ad4e480ccfff8d2c2dde961b937d895bf3d62ed7f7edac7e49fbf17",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "A recent rebuttal to criticism of Bell\u0027s analysis is shown to be defective by\nfault of failure to consider all hypothetical conditions input into the\nderivation of Bell Inequalitites.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0604124",
"authors": [
"A. F. Kracklauer"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"doi": "10.1007/s10702-006-1016-3",
"journal_ref": "Found. Phys. Lett., 19 (6), 625-629 (2006)",
"title": "What\u0027s wrong with this rebuttal?",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0604124"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "f9c88043-dd33-4e6d-840e-5eb9d444956f",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}