{
  "annotation_id": "3a18f20e-5752-4313-85a1-09046c86bc95",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:00.272000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:00.272000Z",
  "file_hash": "d0c0e7885daedc38ab91cdb69e775cdf836d4858257d545f6adbd2a2376669d1",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "In a recent paper, Struyve et al. [Struyve W, De Baere W, De Neve J and De\nWeirdt S 2003 J. Phys. A 36 1525] attempted to show that the thought experiment\nproposed in [Golshani M and Akhavan O 2001 J. Phys. A 34 5259,\nquant-ph/0103101] cannot distinguish between standard and Bohmian quantum\nmechanics. Here, we want to show that, in spite of their objection, our\nconclusion still holds out.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0305020",
    "authors": [
      "O. Akhavan",
      "M. Golshani"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Reply to: Comment on \"Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit   experiment and its disagreement with SQM\"",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0305020"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "3c4c9caf-fdd4-4e44-ae19-e1628426bc69",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}