{
  "annotation_id": "396ee59a-613d-4665-ae7c-b993f897be3f",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:16.542000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:16.542000Z",
  "file_hash": "a1a5b2b397cc8890868d01c287ba7a3e88c0a3a465aacdbb01688fb8f1aa105c",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The oracle model of computation is believed to allow a rigorous proof of\nquantum over classical computational superiority. Since quantum and classical\noracles are essentially different, a correspondence principle is commonly\nimplicitly used as a platform for comparison of oracle complexity. Here, we\nquestion the grounds on which this correspondence is based. Obviously, results\non quantum speed-up depend on the chosen correspondence. So, we introduce the\nnotion of genuine quantum speed-up which can serve as a tool for reliable\ncomparison of quantum vs classical complexity, independently of the chosen\ncorrespondence principle.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0506248",
    "authors": [
      "Antoni Wojcik Ravindra W. Chhajlany"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Quantum-classical correspondence in the oracle model of computation",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0506248"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "479bca5c-82af-4747-a3ed-6852de64b8be",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}