dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaCommon misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument
| Authors | V. Hnizdo |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0005131 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0005131 |
| Journal | Found. Phys. Lett. 11, 359-369 (1998) |
Abstract
A frequently given version of the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen against the completeness of the quantum mechanical description is criticized as a misrepresentation that lacks the cogency of the original EPR argument.
{
"annotation_id": "30b3c89d-2544-4f9f-9e8d-f799beb62c61",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:38.736000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:38.736000Z",
"file_hash": "330ca2ade7400c1f84e01677ec05cb8372d5b872a50f37b4ae3d80bddd4c694e",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "A frequently given version of the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen\nagainst the completeness of the quantum mechanical description is criticized as\na misrepresentation that lacks the cogency of the original EPR argument.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0005131",
"authors": [
"V. Hnizdo"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"journal_ref": "Found. Phys. Lett. 11, 359-369 (1998)",
"title": "Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0005131"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "3ee8aed1-2499-45e7-a978-1e3f9f2af2a2",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}