{
  "annotation_id": "2e9a79d3-3c8a-472f-b89d-cc0af7666672",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:30.418000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:30.418000Z",
  "file_hash": "6355c96f4576147c12408603ef34c6f8e37ec5719414ff9061fe08f2059fc961",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "A common understanding of quantum mechanics (QM) among students and practical\nusers is often plagued by a number of \"myths\", that is, widely accepted claims\non which there is not really a general consensus among experts in foundations\nof QM. These myths include wave-particle duality, time-energy uncertainty\nrelation, fundamental randomness, the absence of measurement-independent\nreality, locality of QM, nonlocality of QM, the existence of well-defined\nrelativistic QM, the claims that quantum field theory (QFT) solves the problems\nof relativistic QM or that QFT is a theory of particles, as well as myths on\nblack-hole entropy. The fact is that the existence of various theoretical and\ninterpretational ambiguities underlying these myths does not yet allow us to\naccept them as proven facts. I review the main arguments and counterarguments\nlying behind these myths and conclude that QM is still a\nnot-yet-completely-understood theory open to further fundamental research.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0609163",
    "authors": [
      "H. Nikolic"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph",
      "gr-qc",
      "hep-th",
      "physics.ed-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1007/s10701-007-9176-y",
    "journal_ref": "Found.Phys.37:1563-1611,2007",
    "title": "Quantum mechanics: Myths and facts",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609163"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "e019ec5a-9654-4998-a7fe-23880caf1586",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}