{
  "annotation_id": "2e576684-ac84-4d2c-bb14-be648d1334ae",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:23.626000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:23.626000Z",
  "file_hash": "dc4319378d5bdd51ee64327488f797ae3a2e4b8efb3c861426d06ccd982cfe8b",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Quantum Mechanics lacks an intuitive interpretation, which is the cause of a\ngenerally formalistic approach to its use. This in turn has led to a certain\ninsensitivity to the actual meaning of many words used in its description and\ninterpretation. Herein, we analyze carefully the possible mathematical meanings\nof those terms used in analysis of EPR\u0027s contention, that Quantum Mechanics is\nincomplete, as well as Bell\u0027s work descendant therefrom. As a result, many\ninconsistencies and errors in contemporary discussions of nonlocality, as well\nas in Bell\u0027s Ansatz with respect to the laws of probability, are identified.\nEvading these errors precludes serious conflicts between Quantum Mechanics and\nboth Special Relativity and Philosophy.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0602080",
    "authors": [
      "A. F. Kracklauer"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1134/S0030400X07090147",
    "title": "Nonlocality, Bell\u0027s Ansatz and Probability",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0602080"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "821db9aa-add5-4edc-a42d-0a475055e9b6",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}