{
  "annotation_id": "2e451c3f-077e-4cad-865e-7df5b174a277",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:11.272000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:11.272000Z",
  "file_hash": "61d8f6177e9efcab5d0a289424e224effd3906aa383d6be1d856e804416a44e2",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "How can econophysics contribute to economics? Since the relation between\nbasic principles of physics and economics is not established, there is no\nreason why physical theories should be of any value for economic theory. While\neconomic theories leave the physicists largely without orientation in this\nfield, econo-physicists should orient themselves at concrete problems from\neconomic practice rather than from economic academics. Thereby physicists\nshould respect the lead of economists. This then also puts physics closer to\neconometrics. Then the natural strength of physics in dealing with empirical\ndata as the fundamental basis for its research could be valuable for both,\ntheory as well as for applications in economics.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0607033",
    "authors": [
      "S. Reimann"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.soc-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Eco - No(?) - Physics - comments and reflexions -",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0607033"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "150dd166-7789-4eb4-94eb-021e5753cde2",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}