{
  "annotation_id": "2da8ee5c-6132-4792-a879-3c0198bffc15",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:52.611000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:52.611000Z",
  "file_hash": "dac07832bde1401fc113ca6224e2a0b3323533980b9fbdf19c53064c6386a18a",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We study a simple example of a sequential game illustrating problems\nconnected with making rational decisions that are universal for social\nsciences. The set of chooser\u0027s optimal decisions that manifest his preferences\nin case of a constant strategy of the adversary (the offering player), is\ninvestigated. It turns out that the order imposed by the player\u0027s rational\npreferences can be intransitive. The presented quantitative results imply a\nrevision of the \"common sense\" opinions stating that preferences showing\nintransitivity are paradoxical and undesired.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0408022",
    "authors": [
      "Edward W. Piotrowski",
      "Marcin Makowski"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.soc-ph",
      "physics.data-an"
    ],
    "title": "Cat\u0027s Dilemma - transitivity vs. intransitivity",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0408022"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "6f170e46-b6ee-4114-99e0-13a7e528a37c",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}