{
  "annotation_id": "2b8efeb0-c3d5-47cd-a804-2aa297389f5f",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:15.187000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:15.187000Z",
  "file_hash": "6f5fed487ac4ef3061cb95d95e2c5c3a789b73d0168c58a045f20252e9640092",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The experimental PNC results in $^{18}$F, $^{19}$F, $^{21}$Ne and the current\ntheoretical analysis show a discrepancy . If one interprets the small limit of\nthe experimentally extracted PNC matrix element for $^{21}$Ne as a destructive\ninterference between the isoscalar and the isovector contribution, then it is\ndifficult to understand why the isovector contribution in $^{18}$F is so small\nwhile the isoscalar + isovector contribution in $^{19}$F is relatively large.\nIn order to understand the origin of this discrepancy a comparison of the\ncalculated PNC matrix elements was performed. It is shown that the $^{18}$F and\n$^{21}$Ne matrix elements contain important contributions from 3$\\hbar \\omega$\nand 4$\\hbar \\omega$ configuration and that the (0+1)$\\hbar \\omega$ calculations\ngive distorted results.",
    "arxiv_id": "nucl-th/9405027",
    "authors": [
      "Mihai Horoi",
      "B. Alex Brown"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "nucl-th"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.231",
    "title": "Toward a Consistent Description of the PNC Experiments in A=18-21 Nuclei",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9405027"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "72089481-f027-484b-b37c-339d93bd5073",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}