dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaComment on 'Quantum Backreaction on "Classical" Variables'
| Authors | Lajos Diosi |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/9503003 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9503003 |
| DOI | 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4088 |
| Journal | Phys.Rev.Lett. 76 (1996) 4088 |
Abstract
It is argued that the bracket of Anderson's canonical theory should have been antisymmetric otherwise serious controversies arise like violation of both hermiticity and the Leibniz rule of differentiation.
{
"annotation_id": "2a3605cd-e7df-451d-912b-4f8889d5440d",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:38.017000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:38.017000Z",
"file_hash": "114131542a0c3b7fa11a8afd5f72605ed9e2ef62b7d84d061b2e90e842ad0d5c",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "It is argued that the bracket of Anderson\u0027s canonical theory should have been\nantisymmetric otherwise serious controversies arise like violation of both\nhermiticity and the Leibniz rule of differentiation.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/9503003",
"authors": [
"Lajos Diosi"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"doi": "10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4088",
"journal_ref": "Phys.Rev.Lett. 76 (1996) 4088",
"title": "Comment on \u0027Quantum Backreaction on \"Classical\" Variables\u0027",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9503003"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "7bf6369a-f9c9-42e6-886c-362303363b78",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}