{
  "annotation_id": "297c504f-1f76-4772-b703-f550939c0b1c",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:56.560000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:56.560000Z",
  "file_hash": "faab1fa465cd82556b1de58e191b1d6b23298afe2e63c58bea83e7cfbe3be450",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We critically analyze the problem of formulating duality between fringe\nvisibility and which-way information, in multibeam interference experiments. We\nshow that the traditional notion of visibility is incompatible with any\nintuitive idea of complementarity, but for the two-beam case. We derive a\nnumber of new inequalities, not present in the two-beam case, one of them\ncoinciding with a recently proposed multibeam generalization of the inequality\nfound by Greenberger and YaSin. We show, by an explicit procedure of\noptimization in a three-beam case, that suggested generalizations of Englert\u0027s\ninequality, do not convey, differently from the two-beam case, the idea of\ncomplementarity, according to which an increase of visibility is at the cost of\na loss in path information, and viceversa.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0301017",
    "authors": [
      "G. Bimonte",
      "R. Musto"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph",
      "hep-th"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1088/0305-4470/36/45/009",
    "journal_ref": "J.Phys.A36:11481-11502,2003",
    "title": "On Interferometric Duality in Multibeam Experiments",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0301017"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "8be67283-e9df-4b71-8853-2f4f336f3068",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}