dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaPhase Space Correspondence between Classical Optics and Quantum Mechanics
| Authors | Daniela Dragoman |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0402100 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0402100 |
| Journal | Progress in Optics vol. 42,pp.424-486, 2002 |
Abstract
The paper scrutinizes both the similarities and the differences between the classical optics and quantum mechanical theories in phase space, especially between the Wigner distribution functions defined in the respective phase spaces. Classical optics is able to provide an understanding of either the corpuscular or wave aspects of quantum mechanics, reflected in phase space through the classical limit of the quantum Wigner distribution function or the Wigner distribution function in classical optics, respectively. However, classical optics, as any classical theory, cannot mimic the wave-particle duality that is at the heart of quantum mechanics. Moreover, it is never enough underlined that, although the mathematical phase space formalisms in classical optics and quantum mechanics are very similar, the main difference between these theories, evidenced in the results of measurements, is as deep as it can get even in phase space. On the other hand, the phase space treatment allows an unexpected similar treatment of interference phenomena, although quantum and classical superpositions of wavefunctions and fields, respectively, have a completely different behavior. This similarity originates in the bilinear character of the Wigner distribution function in both quantum mechanics and classical optical wave theory. Actually, the phase space treatment of the quantum and classical wave theory is identical from the mathematical point of view, if the Planck constant is replaced by the wavelength of light. Even Wigner distribution functions of particular quantum states, such as the Schrodinger cat state, can be mimicked by classical optical means, but not the true quantum character, which resides in the probability significance of the wavefunction, in comparison to the physical realness of classical wave fields.
{
"annotation_id": "26d49b08-e35b-4582-a2b8-32ac7c165ca6",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:06.437000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:06.437000Z",
"file_hash": "3051a2336ff4034dbc640ae878c043c401f757fb7fc147fc89a237d09714dc0d",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "The paper scrutinizes both the similarities and the differences between the\nclassical optics and quantum mechanical theories in phase space, especially\nbetween the Wigner distribution functions defined in the respective phase\nspaces. Classical optics is able to provide an understanding of either the\ncorpuscular or wave aspects of quantum mechanics, reflected in phase space\nthrough the classical limit of the quantum Wigner distribution function or the\nWigner distribution function in classical optics, respectively. However,\nclassical optics, as any classical theory, cannot mimic the wave-particle\nduality that is at the heart of quantum mechanics. Moreover, it is never enough\nunderlined that, although the mathematical phase space formalisms in classical\noptics and quantum mechanics are very similar, the main difference between\nthese theories, evidenced in the results of measurements, is as deep as it can\nget even in phase space. On the other hand, the phase space treatment allows an\nunexpected similar treatment of interference phenomena, although quantum and\nclassical superpositions of wavefunctions and fields, respectively, have a\ncompletely different behavior. This similarity originates in the bilinear\ncharacter of the Wigner distribution function in both quantum mechanics and\nclassical optical wave theory. Actually, the phase space treatment of the\nquantum and classical wave theory is identical from the mathematical point of\nview, if the Planck constant is replaced by the wavelength of light. Even\nWigner distribution functions of particular quantum states, such as the\nSchrodinger cat state, can be mimicked by classical optical means, but not the\ntrue quantum character, which resides in the probability significance of the\nwavefunction, in comparison to the physical realness of classical wave fields.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0402100",
"authors": [
"Daniela Dragoman"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"journal_ref": "Progress in Optics vol. 42,pp.424-486, 2002",
"title": "Phase Space Correspondence between Classical Optics and Quantum Mechanics",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0402100"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "fa12852a-0c52-441c-85bc-2cb074ff7559",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}