dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaDiagonalization Without Relativization A Closer Look at the Baker-Gill-Solovay Theorem
| Authors | Baruch Garcia |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | 2601.09702vv1 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09702 |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Abstract
We already know that several problems like the inequivalence of P and EXP as well as the undecidability of the acceptance problem and halting problem relativize. However, relativization is a limited tool which cannot separate other complexity classes. What has not been proven explicitly is whether the Turing-recognizability of the acceptance problem relativizes. We will consider an oracle for which R and RE are equivalent; RA = REA, where A is an oracle for the equivalence problem in the class ALL, but not in RE nor co-RE. We will then differentiate between relativization and what we will call "semi-relativization", i.e., separating classes using only the acceptance problem oracle. We argue the separation of R and RE is a fact that only "semi-relativization" proves. We will then "scale down" to the polynomial analog of R and RE, to evade the Baker-Gill-Solovay barrier using "semi-relativized" diagonalization, noting this subtle distinction between diagonalization and relativization. This "polynomial acceptance problem" is then reducible to CIRCUIT-SAT and 3-CNF-SAT proving that these problems are undecidable in polynomial time yet verifiable in polynomial time. "Semi-relativization" does not employ arithmetization to evade the relativization barrier, and so itself evades the algebrization barrier of Aaronson and Wigderson. Finally, since semi-relativization is a non-constructive technique, the natural proofs barrier of Razborov and Rudich is evaded. Thus the separation of R and RE as well as P and NP both do not relativize but do "semi-relativize", evading all three barriers.
{
"annotation_id": "20bea880-d0c8-4a9d-8886-1cdd34d8f5f9",
"date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:20.175000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:20.175000Z",
"file_hash": "8db92914a4b12df04f34adfd5dd280814b81d46c38524b918c4b4c359cd990bf",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "We already know that several problems like the inequivalence of P and EXP as well as the undecidability of the acceptance problem and halting problem relativize. However, relativization is a limited tool which cannot separate other complexity classes. What has not been proven explicitly is whether the Turing-recognizability of the acceptance problem relativizes. We will consider an oracle for which R and RE are equivalent; RA = REA, where A is an oracle for the equivalence problem in the class ALL, but not in RE nor co-RE. We will then differentiate between relativization and what we will call \"semi-relativization\", i.e., separating classes using only the acceptance problem oracle. We argue the separation of R and RE is a fact that only \"semi-relativization\" proves. We will then \"scale down\" to the polynomial analog of R and RE, to evade the Baker-Gill-Solovay barrier using \"semi-relativized\" diagonalization, noting this subtle distinction between diagonalization and relativization. This \"polynomial acceptance problem\" is then reducible to CIRCUIT-SAT and 3-CNF-SAT proving that these problems are undecidable in polynomial time yet verifiable in polynomial time. \"Semi-relativization\" does not employ arithmetization to evade the relativization barrier, and so itself evades the algebrization barrier of Aaronson and Wigderson. Finally, since semi-relativization is a non-constructive technique, the natural proofs barrier of Razborov and Rudich is evaded. Thus the separation of R and RE as well as P and NP both do not relativize but do \"semi-relativize\", evading all three barriers.",
"arxiv_id": "2601.09702",
"authors": [
"Baruch Garcia"
],
"categories": [
"cs.CC"
],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"title": "Diagonalization Without Relativization A Closer Look at the Baker-Gill-Solovay Theorem",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09702",
"version": "v1"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "c27dbf16-1913-42cc-b123-be1fda7ecf5f",
"id": "arXiv Dataset",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}