{
  "annotation_id": "1cca2e49-d3fc-40da-8fb3-f7291e55e9f9",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:35.764000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:35.764000Z",
  "file_hash": "f939c040352fe4f725da36933d376b02f07b2fcc60c89170f9ac4eb3f3e2f4d7",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Different analytic expressions for the membrane potential distribution of\nmembranes subject to synaptic noise have been proposed, and can be very helpful\nto analyze experimental data. However, all of these expressions are either\napproximations or limit cases, and it is not clear how they compare, and which\nexpression should be used in a given situation. In this note, we provide a\ncomparison of the different approximations available, with an aim to delineate\nwhich expression is most suitable for analyzing experimental data.",
    "arxiv_id": "q-bio/0602010",
    "authors": [
      "Michelle Rudolph",
      "Alain Destexhe"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "q-bio.NC",
      "q-bio.QM"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "Neural Computation (in press, 2006)",
    "title": "On the use of analytic expressions for the voltage distribution to   analyze intracellular recordings",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0602010"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "552164a8-f2d4-4078-a3dd-381a6b6e404f",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}