{
  "annotation_id": "1c38e681-81e3-41ac-8866-87dd1976ad20",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:48.096000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:48.096000Z",
  "file_hash": "a8fcf1005f7b62141412d60a4a1c0eaad946b879083dfb967d8a7f53e9c584be",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The best mathematical arguments against a realistic interpretation of quantum\nmechanics - that gives definite but partially unknown values to all observables\n- are analysed and shown to be based on reasoning that is not compelling.\n  This opens the door for an interpretation that, while respecting the\nindeterministic nature of quantum mechanics, allows to speak of definite values\nfor all observables at any time that are, however, only partially measurable.\n  The analysis also suggests new ways to test the foundations of quantum\ntheory.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/9908071",
    "authors": [
      "Arnold Neumaier"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "On a realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9908071"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "63569f4d-4117-4940-9c7e-8e4cb37a789f",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}