dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaBenchmarking Cross-Lingual Semantic Alignment in Multilingual Embeddings
| Authors | Wen G. Gong |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | 2601.09732vv1 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09732 |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Abstract
With hundreds of multilingual embedding models available, practitioners lack clear guidance on which provide genuine cross-lingual semantic alignment versus task performance through language-specific patterns. Task-driven benchmarks (MTEB) may mask fundamental alignment shortcomings. We introduce Semantic Affinity (SA), a bounded (between 0 and 1) metric measuring inter-lingual to intra-lingual spread ratio using cosine distance, combined with PHATE visualization in our Semanscope framework. Benchmarking 13 models across 4 datasets (52 experiments) reveals a three-tier structure: (1) Top BERT models (LaBSE SA = 0.70, USE SA = 0.68, S-BERT SA = 0.68) achieve strong alignment via translation-pair supervision; (2) LLM embeddings plateau at SA between 0.55 and 0.61 regardless of 0.6 B to 8 B scale; (3) MLM-only BERT models (mBERT, XLM-R, SA < 0.50) fail despite more than 100 language training. Training objective, not architecture or scale, determines alignment. Oracle Bone primitives (1200 BCE) expose semantic drift-models learn corpus patterns rather than cognitive primitives. This work provides semantic benchmarking to help practitioners select quality multilingual embeddings from hundreds of available models, showing cross-lingual alignment requires explicit translation supervision, not merely model scale or multilingual data.
{
"annotation_id": "1afb9c81-5fe8-4fde-97b9-e5c7aaac8b7c",
"date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:24.166000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:24.166000Z",
"file_hash": "39a116ffc8a97912d7d70167d0e0e1c75484bcc790422e6f0f2265393e62c5dc",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "With hundreds of multilingual embedding models available, practitioners lack clear guidance on which provide genuine cross-lingual semantic alignment versus task performance through language-specific patterns. Task-driven benchmarks (MTEB) may mask fundamental alignment shortcomings. We introduce Semantic Affinity (SA), a bounded (between 0 and 1) metric measuring inter-lingual to intra-lingual spread ratio using cosine distance, combined with PHATE visualization in our Semanscope framework. Benchmarking 13 models across 4 datasets (52 experiments) reveals a three-tier structure: (1) Top BERT models (LaBSE SA = 0.70, USE SA = 0.68, S-BERT SA = 0.68) achieve strong alignment via translation-pair supervision; (2) LLM embeddings plateau at SA between 0.55 and 0.61 regardless of 0.6 B to 8 B scale; (3) MLM-only BERT models (mBERT, XLM-R, SA \u003c 0.50) fail despite more than 100 language training. Training objective, not architecture or scale, determines alignment. Oracle Bone primitives (1200 BCE) expose semantic drift-models learn corpus patterns rather than cognitive primitives. This work provides semantic benchmarking to help practitioners select quality multilingual embeddings from hundreds of available models, showing cross-lingual alignment requires explicit translation supervision, not merely model scale or multilingual data.",
"arxiv_id": "2601.09732",
"authors": [
"Wen G. Gong"
],
"categories": [
"cs.CL"
],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"title": "Benchmarking Cross-Lingual Semantic Alignment in Multilingual Embeddings",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09732",
"version": "v1"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "ba1c3662-a11b-4ef3-94fa-026099c61a28",
"id": "arXiv Dataset",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}