{
  "annotation_id": "1a40599a-17cb-4db5-9aeb-8f2ab6d7f44d",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:18.027000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:18.027000Z",
  "file_hash": "93f83160032aff2a6094f583b22678955a0716afa5bc1d95a3704a50480e49ac",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Aiming at automating the different trades intervening in mechanical parts\u0027\ndesign activities, one finds the weakest link within the interface linking the\ncomputer aided-design trade (CAD) and the process planning trade (CAPP) where a\nhuge semantic gap is detected. Works generally tends to optimize the\npre-process planning trade (design/CAD) and post-process planning trade\n(machinning/CAM). So as to bridge in between CAD and CAPP we present at first\nsupport functions that helps a process planner setting a process plan for an\naircraft structural part. The proposed functions will be forwarded in the same\norder the planner questions himself during his first analysis. Each function is\njustified by presenting the need behind. We end up on the benefits of having\nsuch an assistance tool as we mention the future perspectives of our works.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0701142",
    "authors": [
      "Ramy Harik",
      "Vincent Capponi",
      "Muriel Lombard",
      "Gabriel Ris"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.class-ph"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "4th CESA Multiconference on \"Computational Engineering in Systems\n  Applications\" (04/10/2006) XX",
    "title": "Enhanced functions supporting process planning for aircraft structural   parts",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0701142"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "d9180f17-a1c4-4afa-9c28-ef4cc56f32c4",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}