{
  "annotation_id": "1684d5de-32f5-4a19-a79b-d0b6bedc75d4",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:21.416000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:21.416000Z",
  "file_hash": "be25d98bbc69a9751a349ed19e38ca579fcebd40931b4b20fb7804bc9c52b175",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We submit the viewpoint that, perhaps, some of the controversies in\ngravitation occurred during this century are not due to insufficiencies of\nEinstein\u0027s field equations, but rather to insufficiencies in the mathematics\nused for their treatment. For this purpose we treat the same equations with the\nnovel, broader isomathematics and related isominkowskian geometry, and show an\napparently final resolution in favor of existing relativities of controversies\nsuch as: the lack of invariance of the basic units of space and time; lack of\ncompatibility between gravitational and relativistic conservation laws; lack of\nmeaningful relativistic limit of gravitation; and others. However, an apparent\nnecessary condition for the resolution of these controversies is the\nabandonment of the notion of curvature used in this century in favor of a\nconceptual and mathematical broader notion. A number of intriguing implications\nand experimental verifications are pointed out.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/9707018",
    "authors": [
      "Ruggero Maria Santilli"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.gen-ph"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "Hadronic J.21:113-169,1998",
    "title": "Isominkowskian formulation of gravity",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9707018"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "6c1cf9f2-b77b-4644-8a26-a4aaf6af6436",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}