{
  "annotation_id": "135ad439-77a8-40dc-a7d6-a1b4962f81cf",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:07.213000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:07.213000Z",
  "file_hash": "7078361684268a1c6379c2b7bcb910b3d6a484ac9493d0cc651c620c8f00b39f",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Even if Einstein brought major contributions as a founder of quantum\nmechanics, he remained deeply unsatisfied with the bases of this structure he\nknew to be so efficient for physics. His critics are often known through his\nnumerous controversies wih N. Bohr for a few decades. It has long been\nsuggested that his critics were obsolete and came from an aging man and that it\nwas more a question of philosophy anyway. After J. Bell\u0027s contribution however\nit was claimed that the debate could be closed by an experimental proof, a\nstrange experimental intrusion in philosophy or a strange philosophy. Finally,\nthe experiment being performed, in particular in Orsay with the repeatedly\nsuccessful experiments of A. Aspect, it was claimed that N. Bohr won. Would the\ndebate be closed? Today and fifty years after his death, it seems that\nEinstein\u0027s critics to quantum mechanics are being regarded differently. Why is\nit so? Is it due to physics coming back to the debate? It will be attempted to\naccurately report Einstein\u0027s writings on the matter and to find elements of\nanswer to the raised questions.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0602044",
    "authors": [
      "P. Roussel"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.hist-ph",
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Einstein et la mecanique quantique - Quelques reperes, quelques   surprises",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0602044"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "5817b04c-1b98-4d8b-b2f6-ca154e4cd10c",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}