{
  "annotation_id": "127a659c-7dc5-4c2b-ba2b-668ec3c35c02",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:27.358000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:27.358000Z",
  "file_hash": "094a18c8fd1429141476e2a9f54aa1675de264183f17be77d49b722c688801e2",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The classical three-box paradox of Kirkpatrick [J. Phys. A 36 4891 (2003)] is\ncompared to the original quantum Three-Box paradox of Aharonov and Vaidman [J.\nPhys. A 24 2315 (1991)]. It is argued that the quantum Three-Box experiment is\na \"quantum paradox\" in the sense that it is an example of a classical task\nwhich cannot be accomplished using classical means, but can be accomplished\nusing quantum devices. It is shown that Kirkpatrick\u0027s card game is analogous to\na different game with a particle in three boxes which does not contain\nparadoxical features.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0606067",
    "authors": [
      "Tamar Ravon",
      "Lev Vaidman"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1088/1751-8113/40/11/021",
    "title": "The Three-Box Paradox Revisited",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0606067"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "1c2b1172-3cb6-46cc-b8fa-04b1d1a08f23",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}