{
  "annotation_id": "10097060-6f01-4444-9102-0fca888db1dd",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:55.800000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:55.800000Z",
  "file_hash": "079f368853becf3a48fdcf40869894f7700c015f047d63b52472bf77b0d0401b",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "In this revised reply to quant-ph/0211165, I address the question of the\nvalidity of my results in greater detail, by comparing my predictions to those\nof the Silberfarb-Deutsch model, and I deal at greater length with the beam\narea paradox. As before, I conclude that my previous results are an\n(order-of-magnitude) accurate estimate of the error probability introduced in\nquantum logical operations by the quantum nature of the laser field. While this\nerror will typically (for a paraxial beam) be smaller than the total error due\nto spontaneous emission, a unified treatment of both effects reveals that they\nlead to formally similar constraints on the minimum number of photons per pulse\nrequired to perform an operation with a given accuracy; these constraints agree\nwith those I have derived elsewhere.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0212027",
    "authors": [
      "Julio Gea-Banacloche"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.68.046303",
    "title": "Reply to \"Comment on \"Some implications of the quantum nature of laser   fields for quantum computations\u0027\u0027\u0027\u0027",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0212027"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "d569e6ea-653f-4aa4-ba96-3c8f3d07e4e2",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}